Why is it when people need help, one party has no problem starting wars but don't want to take care of those people when they come back home. They love to compare the homeless to the refugees by stating they want to help the homeless first, before the refugees. Yet, they are known to not help anyone, but themselves, first.
When people say they want to help the homeless first. If that is the case, why haven't they done more now? Instead of waiting for a crisis, then stand up and say,"help the homeless first before the refugees". If they have not helped the homeless, then where do you think they would even help refugees? Except to fear what they do not know. None of us do.
It seems they think, if we can find the money to help the refugees, then why can't we find the money to help the homeless, first. Does it take an on slot of refugees for them to stand up and notice the homeless. No, they are too busy supporting war first, to even give it a thought, until something happens they do not like, or fear. These kinds of people love to wage war, as long as they don't have skin in the game.
We can do both. We can take care of the homeless and the refugees at the same time once we stop spending money on wars. We seem to find the money for wars; but not for the homeless and refugees. Why is that? These same people that love to make war, hate to help those that went to war for them. They love to shoot off their mouths and make excuses in useless comparisons; but have no problem, being the problem. They are the problem and the real trouble makers that stand in the way of people getting the help they need, from all of us.
James C. Garland
Comments
Post a Comment